Saturday, January 31, 2015

Israel: The Ultimate Dispersal Part One

What is Done In The Darkness Will Be Revealed In The Light
          
            In this article my aim is to address the dispersal of the people of Israel after the attack of the Romans around 70 AD, but before doing so I will delve a little bit more into the happenings on the continent of Europe and its consequences for the rest of the world.  When one looks at nations around the world historically and now there have always been a Black man of some type whether he is described as a negroid, pygmy, australoid or mongoloid as a foundation of the initial culture or civilization.  It stands to reason that this is the case with Europe as well.  However, with Europe it is for some reason murky because of it being the last homeland in the main of white people.  One tends to assume that because a lot of white people are there now that this was always the case from the Greeks to European nobility.  Once more this concept is additionally buttressed by, if you live in America, the educational system and media.  
In my article Nebuchadnezzar’s Dream:  The Divine Scheme Of Empires In The History Of Men, I asserted that the statue in Nebuchadnezzar’s Dream represented a succession of Black rule and led empires in addition to his own.  The last one was the Roman empire, the empire of iron.  The ten toes of the statute represented a continuation of the Roman empire but not as strong as it was mixed with clay with the clay indicating the nobility marrying a people of lesser stature in their eyes of “whites.”  Because Europe became the arena of invasion, immigration and conquest, it is more difficult to ascertain when the Blacks of that continent gave way to the contemporaneous and influx of “whites.”  But there certainly came a time when it happened and Martin Bernal’s Black Athena (The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization) which raised an uproar when it was published gives an indication of that shift.  
In his introduction, Bernal proposes that there are two models of Greek history:  one viewing Greece as essentially European or Aryan and the other seeing it as Levantine on the periphery of Egyptian and Semitic culture.  He calls them the “Aryan” and “Ancient” model.  The ancient model (I summarize) was the conventional view among the Greeks in the classical and Hellenistic ages that Greek culture was a product of colonization around 1500 BC by Egyptian and Phoenicians who had civilized the native inhabitants and the Greeks continued to borrow heavily from near Eastern cultures.  The Aryan model developed around the first half of the 19th century denied the truth of the Egyptian settlement and questioned those of the Phoenicians.  What he calls the extreme Aryan model of the 1890’s, 1920’s and 30’s denied even the Phoenician cultural influence.  
The Aryan model proposed that there had been an invasion from the North unreported in ancient tradition which had overwhelmed the local Aegean and Pre-Hellenic culture and thus Greek culture is a result of the mixture of Indo-European Hellenes and their indigenous subjects.  Bernal basically concludes that the Ancient Model had no major internal deficiencies or weaknesses in explanatory power and that it was overthrown for external reasons.  He maintains that for the 18th and 19th century Romantics and racists, it was simply intolerable for Greece, which was seen not merely as the epitome of Europe but also as its pure childhood, to have been the result of mixture between native Europeans and colonizing Africans and Semites.  Therefore, the Ancient Model had to be overthrown and replaced with something more acceptable.  This one statement represents the approach to history once the white sons of Japheth gained control of and power around the world.  During their time of expansion and colonization of the lands of people of color, it somewhere became necessary to create a historical past that denied the seminal foundation and contribution of the Black race to civilization.  By the time of the 18th and 19th century when racism was kicking into high gear the contribution of the Black Islamic moors to European civilization and seemingly one of the last times Blacks would be in power from the Ismael (Arab) side, was steadily being replaced with a Star Trek like holodeck history of white greatness and black subjugation.   
There is a reason for white racism and it did not develop in a vacuum.  It is evident that Blacks were ruling ancient civilizations for a long time and the reason the ancient Greeks could admit to an Egyptian and Phoenician colonization is because they were doubtlessly in their original state of melanin (black/brown) as were the Egyptians and Phoenicians.  When the whites infiltrated their lands or arose in some cases probably out of albinism, the usual population of mulattoes followed, but it is evident that it took some centuries after the decline and fall of the Roman empire for Blacks to be completely out of power for the paradigm to shift from one of Black ascendancy to that of White.  I imagine for  “whites” it was a long day coming and their time under Black civilizations could have been similar to the time of Blacks under their civilization with the exception of the  Blacks fabrication of history.  Although, whites may have felt a need to erase the memory of Black rule out of perhaps survival instinct, it would equally serve to affect the people of Israel in the Ultimate Dispersal spoken of by Jesus in Luke 21:24.  I will dive further into that in the next article.  The following are what I believe are examples of Black rule and presence in Europe.

Nicephorus III Roman Byzantine Emperor
Black Madonna Montserrat Spain
Roman head 2nd or 3rd century AD found at site of ancient roman bathhouse in England.



Saturday, January 17, 2015

Japheth: Dwelling In The Tent of Shem

"You can't handle the Truth" quote from the movie Few Good Men

    In the movie a “Few Good Men” the main character Daniel Kaffee played by Tom Cruise is a young lawyer in the armed forces tasked with defending two marines who are accused of the murder of a fellow soldier private William Santiago.  Jack Nicholson plays Colonel Nathan Jessup a high ranking official in the marine branch of the US military.  The marines basic contention in the case is that they were ordered to take action against the fellow marine who ends up dead whereas the higher ups were contending that the soldiers acted on their own accord.  Colonel Jessup especially had an airtight alibi plus the respect assigned to his rank.  
Since my memory did not serve me correct in all the details of the movie, wikipedia provided that Kaffee is convinced by a fellow officer to call Jessup as a witness despite the risk of being court-martialed for smearing a high ranking officer.  Jessup is cool as a cucumber during the questioning by Kaffee, but it is the perfection of Jessup that eventually leads to his undoing and of Jack Nicholson growling probably one of the most famous lines in movie cinema of “you can’t handle truth.”  Jessup was caught in a lie because according to him his orders are always followed thus if he had ordered that private Santiago be transferred off the base, then why did those two marines disobey orders and kill private Santiago?  
The presentation of history as proffered by the American educational system and ratified by its media is very much like Colonel Jessup.  It is the testimony of perfection.  Everyone in antiquity who are founders and rulers of civilization are always depicted as “whites”.   I observed this about the movie Exodus: Gods and Kings in my article The Making Of The Races: What’s Melanin Got To Do With It.  All the supposed ancient statuary with a caucasoid phenotype is always beautifully intact particularly as it relates to ancient Greece and Rome.  Much of the statuary with a Hamitic broad phenotype seem to always have their noses smashed and faces disfigured much like the Sphinx of Egypt though you can still tell it is of a Black African.  
In historical accounts dealing with medieval Europe, you will rarely find Blacks mentioned let alone represented pictorially.  However, much like Colonel Jessup there is a wrinkle in this tale of perfection and it is biblically provided.  I mentioned it in a previous article Prophetic Restoration.  In it I referenced Luke 21: 24 where Jesus tells the disciples speaking of the people of Jerusalem, “And they will fall by the edge of the sword and be lead away captive into all nations. Jerusalem will trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled. This one phrase impeaches the testimony of a perfect history as told by “whites.” 
In my last article Nebuchadnezzar’s Dream: The Divine Scheme Of Empires In The History of Men,  I mentioned the difficulty of locating a son of Japheth in antiquity and I now add with the aid of the Book of Jasher found his representation in Tarshish a son of Javan of the isles of Minoan Crete of the Black Dravidan Indian type with possibly along with some Cushitic types made up the initial native population of Greece and Rome with later infiltration of  tribal whites from Central Asia giving rise to the usual swath of mulattoes.  I also believe that among them were their own whites due to albinism as in my previous example of the Roma Gypsies. 
Additionally, the book of Genesis specifically associates Japheth with location among the isles and links them to the Gentiles.  In Genesis 10: 1-5, they list the sons of Japheth, but picking it up at verses 4 and 5, it states, “The sons of Javan were Elishah, Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim.  From these the coastland peoples of the Gentiles were separated into their land… (KJV).  In regards to Japheth when Noah is speaking prophetically over his sons after the flood, he declares, “God enlarge Japheth, Let Him dwell in the tent of Shem; Let Canaan be his servant. (Genesis 9:27).  This prophecy about Japheth has been fulfilled and then some.  However, the irony of it is that it is not the black/brown Japheth who has indeed enlarged himself around the world and into the territories and history of Ham and now dwells as well in the tent/identity of Shem, but “white” Japheth.
The question now becomes “How did Japheth end up dwelling in the tent of Shem?”  Returning back to Luke 21:24, the answer is the depopulation foretold by Jesus of Jerusalem and the subsequent captivity of the people by the nations.  In the presentation of perfect “white” history, whites have never been ruled let alone enslaved by people of color so how is it that white Ashkenazi Jews are considered the authentic people of Abraham a son of Shem and the people of whom Jesus spoke in Luke 21:20-24.  Moreover, Tacitus: History Book 5 (2) has this to say about the ancient city of Judaea:
As I am about to relate the last days of a famous city, it seems appropriate to throw some light on its origin. Some say that the Jews were fugitives from the island of Crete, who settled on the nearest coast of Africa about the time when Saturn was driven from his throne by the power of Jupiter. Evidence of this is sought in the name. There is a famous mountain in Crete called Ida; the neighbouring tribe, the Idaei, came to be called Judaei by a barbarous lengthening of the national name. Others assert that in the reign of Isis the overflowing population of Egypt, led by Hierosolymus and Judas, discharged itself into the neighbouring countries. Many, again, say that they were a race of Ethiopian origin, who in the time of king Cepheus were driven by fear and hatred of their neighbours to seek a new dwelling-place. Others describe them as an Assyrian horde who, not having sufficient territory, took possession of part of Egypt, and founded cities of their own in what is called the Hebrew country, lying on the borders of Syria. Others, again, assign a very distinguished origin to the Jews, alleging that they were the Solymi, a nation celebrated in the poems of Homer, who called the city which they founded Hierosolyma after their own name.
The reader should note the association of the then Jews with Crete, Egypt, Ethiopia, Assyria and the Solymi.  By associating the Jews with these nations it is clear that they are Black in phenotype as Ethiopia in antiquity always refer to Blacks, but also that these other nations at that time still contained native Black populations and were identified as such.  Tacitus additionally supports the prophecy in Daniel of Nebuchadnezzar's dream that the Roman empire was also Black/Brown ruled as the empire of iron because he does something “whites “in the educational/media matrix of America cannot bring themselves to do and that is acknowledge the normative Black/Brown phenotype of the ancient Hebrews/Jews or people of the tribe of Judah. 
The next question that naturally arises, is that if the Jews at the time of Tacitus writing and the discussion of the impending attack on them where Jerusalem is destroyed by the Romans around 70 ad, were still highly melanated, where did they go upon their dispersal?  I will venture more into that question in the next article.  The following are ancient pictorial examples of the Jews around the Roman era and an Assyrian relief showing Hebrew captives.
 



Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Nebuchadnezzar's Dream: The Divine Scheme of Empires In The History Of Men

"There Can Be Only One" quote  from the television series Highlander
 
 

         In the last few articles I have dealt with the subject of race and history.  It is an inquiry I have found necessary to deal with because it is a concern that not only men continue to grapple with, but goes to the heart of those issues which are eternal.  I asserted in a previous article that history and life is not some random chaotic event and also that Israel is the fulcrum upon which history turns.  Therefore, it is important in the context of where we are in the age to ascertain the identity of the correct Israel of antiquity and address the question of where they are now.  All of the ancient empires that existed had a bearing on the nation of Israel and in some cases their ascendancy was due to the corrective measures God assessed Israel due to the breaking of their covenant with him. 
            I am a huge tennis fan given that I played it as a youth and continued to follow it throughout my life.  I was always amazed at how the number one player would rise to the top and dominate a field of literally hundreds of players.   Each one would bring something distinctive to the game that set them apart and allowed them to dominate for a time.  No one demonstrates this better than Rodger Federer.  He is arguably so far the greatest male tennis player of all time.  His talent is prodigious and during his run of 17 grand slams he would often produce flawless and effortless looking tennis.  Even at this time he remains at the top of the game.  What tennis demonstrates is the principle of the parable of talents.  In Matthew 25:14 Jesus tells his disciples the parable of the talents in relation to the coming of the kingdom of heaven.  It states, “again it will be like a man going on a journey, who called his servants and entrusted his wealth to them.  To one he gave five bags of gold, to another two bags and to another one bag.”  
If one reads the rest of this parable they will see that the first two doubled the amount of gold while the last servant did nothing with his bag of gold.  While on the surface this parable can be viewed as a lesson on stewardship, what  I want to highlight is that there was inequality in the amount of gold given in the first place so that what is observed is a pattern of life throughout humanity as well as cosmically.  What is the pattern? It is that everybody cannot be number one.  In any given field there are people with varying degrees of talent, but as in tennis not everyone has the same amount of talent that can propel them to the number one ranking in the world.   The others who are under the number one player are like the supporting cast. 
            This same principle is exhibited throughout all aspects in life.  Someone has to be the top person in charge-the captain of a ship and then his first officer followed by the rest of the seamen.  This is equally demonstrated in the way God has organized relevant empires that affect the people of Israel.  It is the way the spiritual world is organized.  The principalities and powers of the air  have power as well as angels, but they are not the number one player in the spiritual  world.  Jesus displayed in his earthly tenure that the number one ranking and dominance in that world was and is within his provenance.   The principalities and powers of the air have power but God the father with Jesus sitting at his right hand has all power.  In the kingdom of men what we witness is when an empire arises that affects the people of Israel it is the dominate empire or kingdom of its time and all other nations are secondary and submissive to it. 
The book of Daniel and Nebuchadnezzar’s dream is an example of this principle.  In Daniel 2, Daniel a Judean exiled in captivity in Babylon is compelled to interpret on the threat of all the magicians, sorcerers and wise men being put to death the dream of King Nebuchadnezzar.  I will at this point provide a brief synopsis because the dream is very lengthy.  Nebuchadnezzar has a dream in which he sees a large statute.  Daniel reveals that the statue has a head of gold, a chest of silver, a belly and thighs of bronze, legs of iron and feet partly of iron and partly of clay. (vs.32,33).  The head of gold Daniel explains is King Nebuchadnezzar.  He goes to say, You O king are a king of kings. For the God of heaven has given to you a kingdom, power, strength, and glory; and wherever the children of men dwell, or the beasts of the field and the birds of heaven, He has given them into your hand, and has made you ruler over them all. I believe most theologians consider the other three kingdoms to be the Medo-Persian, Greek and then Roman empire. 
There are various interpretations as to the meaning of the feet, but the correct interpretation is that it is the Roman empire later fragmented racially.  Why do I say this?  Daniel in regards to the feet of iron and partly of clay  states in verse 43 “As you saw iron mixed with ceramic clay, they will mingle with the seed of men, but they will not adhere to one another, just as iron does not mix with clay.”  The “they” in the verse refers to the ruling class of each empire and it was doubtlessly common for kings of various empires to think of themselves in a god-like fashion, but what is noticeable also is that each phase of the statue is a solid metal until it arrives at the feet.   Therefore, per the principle of only one being able to occupy the top spot what the solid metal of the statute represents are the successive Black empires and by that I mean people in their original state of melanin.  
Babylon as I showed before in Genesis was founded by Nimrod a son of Cush.  It is reasonable to assume at the time of Nebuchadnezzar Babylon was still a mostly Black/Brown ruled kingdom.  So it follows for Persia, Greece and Rome; however, Greece and Rome being ruled by a Black Dravidian Indian type represented by Japheth the eldest son of Noah and thus being designated as being of the gentiles.  It is with some difficulty that I located in antiquity a son of Japheth as they seem almost non-existent,  but I am of the belief that Tarshish a son of Javan, who was a son of Japheth were inhabitants of isles like Minoan Crete.   Some of the artwork I have seen of ancient Minoans corroborates this. According to New Light On the Dark Age Of Greece by Jan Sammer www.varchive.org  Immanuel Velikovsky was of the view that Tarshish was the name employed by Old Testament writers to designate Crete as a whole or its chief city Knossos.    According to Easton’s Bible Dictionary on www.bible-history.com, Tarshish is a Sanscrit or Aryan word meaning sea coast.   
            Given this backdrop, it is evident that at some point as the Roman empire begin to fade, the Black ruling class begin to marry whites from central Asia who were immigrating in large numbers into Europe for various reasons war being a primary factor.  This is what is meant by they will mingle with the seed of men” as the Whites would have been looked upon as commoners and as different from the Black ruling elite and Egyptian/Cushitic influenced culture of Greece and Rome as proposed by Martin Bernal in Black Athena.
Eventually, the Black nobility of Europe would lose ground and for some phenotype due to mulatto offspring, while as one researcher has suggested when their power was finally broken in the late 1800’s they would be written out of history and whitened over in paintings.  Thus, the prophecy of their not adhering to one another as iron does not mix with clay would be fulfilled.  In the next article I will discuss the sons of Abraham of the line of Shem and how this development with the Roman empire affected them.  

... of maria of antioch with manuel i komnenos vatican library rome
This is  Byzantine emperor Manouel I Komenos and his second wife Maria of Antioch. circa 1118 to 1180.  An example of iron mixed with clay.